ABOUT THIS BLOG

John Tamanaha

MSNBC.com contributor John Tamanaha tackles the hot topics in college football. From title contenders and Heisman hopefuls to coaches on the hot seat and recruiting battles, no issue is out of bounds.



NFL draft yet another USC recruiting tool

Posted: Sunday, April 27, 2008 3:54 PM

Nearly seven months after it occurred, USC’s loss to Stanford got even more amazing on Saturday.

A new addition to the legendary tale about the 41-point underdog Cardinal, playing without their starting quarterback and ending the Trojans’ 35-game home winning streak at the Coliseum, is that there were four NFL first-rounders on the field for USC that night.

Stanford, trying to merely find its way under new head coach Jim Harbaugh, had none.  That, of course, shouldn’t be a surprise.  “The Farm” has produced only five first-round picks since 1983, when John Elway was the first overall selection, and only one since 1993 (tackle Kwame Harris in 2003).

USC, on the other hand, has always had a solid pipeline to the next level and accounted for no less than seven of the 63 players selected on Saturday, the first day of the 2008 NFL Draft, which constitutes two rounds.

Amazing … even by USC’s standards, setting a school record for picks in the first two rounds.

And now, not that he needs it, Pete Carroll’s recruiting pitches get stronger by the moment.

If they were totally honest, all those top-level high school blue-chippers out there would tell you that few things mean more to them than what college and/or coach is going to prepare them best for the NFL.

Before he accelerated USC’s reputation as a feeder outfit for the NFL, Carroll would visit with prep stars and sell his knowledge and experience in the pro game, having spent 16 years working in the NFL, including four seasons as a head coach.

That worked well enough as he produced national championship squads in 2003 and 2004.

But now, Carroll can pitch truly eye-popping production.

In seven seasons at USC, Carroll has seen a whopping 42 of his players get drafted by NFL clubs, with 11 of them being selected in the first round.

Imagine him going into living rooms later this year able to say that he coached twice as many first-rounders last season as the nine other Pac-10 schools combined.  Arizona cornerback Antoine Cason and Oregon running back Jonathan Stewart were the only other two first-rounders from the Pac-10.

Furthermore, outside of USC’s seven selections, the Pac-10 can boast of only four additional picks in the first two rounds, as Arizona State and California each had a second-rounder with center Mike Pollack and wideout DeSean Jackson, respectively.

That’s a pretty tough pill to swallow, especially for the five teams in USC’s league that didn’t have a single first-day selection, including crosstown rival UCLA.

Even nationally, the scorecard doesn’t match up well against the Trojans.

Other than USC, only three teams -- Arkansas, Boston College and Virginia -- had more than one player picked in the first round.  And each of those schools had to have one of its all-time best players -- Darren McFadden, Matt Ryan and Chris Long -- in this year’s draft pool to get that done.

It was just another day at the office for USC.  There were no real headline stealers or early-entry juniors in the first round this season, just a quartet of seniors who are good bets to have solid impacts and big paychecks for several seasons at the next level.

It’s scary to think of what might have been if Trojan linebackers Rey Maualuga and Brian Cushing, both seniors-to-be, threw their names into the hat for this year’s draft.  Five first-rounders? Nine on the first day?

They’ll just have to wait until next year to lead the next truck load of Trojans at the 2009 NFL Draft.

But before that and more importantly, they’ll be counted on to make sure there are no more slipups along the way this fall.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I am wondering if the Crimson Tide had any players that went in the draft this year.
The one point that was left out of this article is that with all that talent, how did they NOT win everything?  How did they lose to Stanford with that much talent?  How did they lose to UCLA with that talent?  How did they not even make it to the MNC with that talent?  
It must be awesome to go to USC!  Free apartments, Snoop Dog in the locker room, and guaranteed first round draft picks.  Go Trojans!
People always hating on the team that's at the top.  Pete Carroll is a machine, he hasn't always been there but his hard work has paid off in extreme dividends.
Paul, Florida you are an idiot! USC didnt lose to UCLA last season schmuck! it was the season before. If you actually watched College ball you might know that one. As for Stanford, USC had a big headed QB with a broken finger thinking he could pull it off instead of letting Sanchez do his job, Oh and for you Paul that is the back up QB. A back up QB is a guy who throws the ball when the starter is injured. Freakin morons like you should just turn the TV back on to figure skating.
Sean,
Your response to Paul is very mean spirited. And immature with the name calling. Paul asks a very legit question. USC has had an abundance of talent, even with their injuries, but have underperformed. I think USC is hampered by their conference play as they are, far and away, the class of the PAC10. But when you only need to play at 75% to win, it makes you vulnerable. And the SEC and Big 10 (11) play at or above their talent level because of tough conference play. And as a Hokie, I think VT will benefit from the ACC getting stronger. So USC is not the only team in that position.
Donniemac, you must be joking. Everytime USC played an out of conference game in the last four years, they have DOMINATED their opponents. Notre Dame, Nebraska, Arkansas, Illinois, Michigan. Their only out of conference loss in the last four years was to Texas for the NC. To say they play better competition than USC does is not only inaccurate, but just plain silly. It will be nice to see USC beat Georgia for the NC this year...you guys got a patsy in Hawaii last year, we'll make you wish you had the chance to play them again.

Wins and loses are determined on the field.  Despite all the talent you have on paper, you still have to go on the field and play the game.  Take the NY Yankees as an example:  With all that talent above everyone else in the league, they should go 162-0 every year and win the World Series.  But they don't and impossible to win every game.  That is why in USC's case, even with all that talent, once in awhile, someone can beat you on any given Saturday.  That is why perfect undefeated seasons are so rare and that is what makes sports fun to watch.  There was a snowballs chance in hell that Stanford would beat USC last year....and for one day the devil got to enjoy his snowcone.
yo, my bro sean, ricky williams is gonna play college ball cause he came out early from texas and he likes the reefer.SDSU is the perfect choice, sun,beach, drugs, TM and yoga classes. He will shock the world! And  learn how to surf too!Then he can ride his bike up the highway to play for the Raiders.They love  rebels!
Why is it that USC gets glamorized for thier actions both on and off the field and Miami gets vilified?  Since 1998 USC has had only 9 first round picks.  Miami on the other hand has had 27 (this does not include the 2008 draft).  
Edgar... so all those s7 Maimi players will be in the NFL Hall Fame soon right? Do you really believe Ray Lewis will be in the HOF? Last time I checked USC had 11 players in the HOF. Find another argument somewhere else.
U$C has the worst reputation. The reason they lost to Stanford is probably the players checks bounced. Kinda like Pete fired twice from the NFL Carroll. U$C should get the death penalty for all the under handed stuff going on there. But I guess the NCAA is on their payroll also.
Bare Feet, you are right in the HOF comment, but what about the time frame in which edgar d. was referring to?  Since 1998, 35 Canes have been drafted in the first 2 rounds, with 6 being drafted in the first round alone in 2004.  Since the mid-late 1990's, no other school has sent more players as high UM.  And not only that, some of the players that are in the NFL now are counted as among the best at their positions (Examples Ed Reed, WIllis McGahee, Clinton Portis.)


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):